Search all 586 artefacts by title, document ID or content.
Printed on the legal letterhead. Page furniture, margins and repeating table headers come from the same stylesheet the PDF service uses.
Edsol Edtech Pvt. Ltd.
Pensieve Labs | Pensieve
POL-GL-066
v1.5.0 | 29 August 2026
POL-GL-066 | Version 1.5.0 | Effective 29 August 2026 | Last Modified On 29 August 2026
Publishing this contact is a legal obligation, not a courtesy. Rule 9 of the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 requires the business contact of the Data Protection Officer, or of a person able to answer questions about the processing of personal data, to be prominently displayed and to be repeated in every response to a rights request. Pensieve does both.
This Policy states how Edsol Edtech Pvt. Ltd. receives, investigates, decides, answers and records a
grievance. It applies to every grievance, whoever raises it and whatever it is about.
A grievance is not a support ticket. A defect, an outage, a slow response or a configuration question
goes to support under SLA-GL-001 and POL-GL-056, where it will be answered faster. A grievance is a
complaint that something Pensieve did, or failed to do, was wrong: unlawful, unfair, in breach of a
commitment, or a failure to honour a right. If you send a grievance to support, or a support issue to
the Grievance Officer, it is routed to the right place and the clock still starts on receipt. You are not
required to know which is which.
1.1 Anyone. Specifically:
| Complainant | Typical subject |
|---|---|
| A Data Principal whose personal data Pensieve holds as a Data Fiduciary | Access, correction, erasure, a rights request not answered, marketing after withdrawal of consent |
| A hospital customer | A breach of a published commitment, conduct of Pensieve personnel, a billing dispute, an access or export failure |
| An Authorised User of the Platform | Credential handling, access records, the conduct of Pensieve personnel |
| A Trust Center user | Access decisions, watermarking, document handling |
| A patient or attendant of a hospital | Almost always a matter for the hospital: see 5 |
| A supplier, adviser or applicant | Contracting conduct, payment, recruitment |
| A security researcher | Handling of a report under POL-GL-059 |
| Anyone else: a regulator, a journalist, a member of the public | Anything |
1.2 No standing requirement. You do not need a contract with Pensieve to raise a grievance, and Pensieve will not decline one on the ground that you are not a customer.
1.3 Anonymous grievances. Accepted and investigated. Pensieve cannot answer you, verify facts with you, or apply the safe-harbour protections at 8 to a person it cannot identify, and says so.
1.4 Raised on your behalf. A grievance may be raised by a representative, an advocate, a nominee under section 14 of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, or a lawful guardian. Pensieve will ask for evidence of authority only where the outcome would disclose personal data.
2.1 Channels.
| Channel | Address |
|---|---|
| Email, the primary channel | info@pensievelabs.org |
| The Trust Center grievance page | https://trust.pensievelabs.org/grievance. It carries this statutory notice, the clocks at 3, the routing rule at 5 and the escalation routes at 6, and it opens a message to the Grievance Officer with the fields at 2.3 already in it. It is not a separate intake system and it stores nothing. The record of a grievance is the message you send and the reply you receive, held by you as well as by Pensieve |
| Post | 28, Jamunather, Bulandshahar, Uttar Pradesh, India |
| Telephone | [TO BE SUPPLIED]. A telephone grievance is recorded in writing by Pensieve and the written record is sent to you to confirm |
| Through your hospital's Pensieve contact | Any Pensieve person receiving a grievance must route it to the Grievance Officer the same Business Day |
2.2 Languages. English and Hindi. Where you write in another language listed in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution, Pensieve will arrange a translation and answer in that language; this may add to the response time and Pensieve will tell you if it does.
2.3 What helps. Your name and a contact address; whether you are a Data Principal, a customer, a user or something else; what happened, with dates; what you want done; and any reference number. A grievance is never rejected for being incomplete. Pensieve asks for what it needs.
2.4 No charge. There is no fee for raising a grievance, at any stage.
2.5 No form required. A plain email is enough.
| Step | Commitment |
|---|---|
| Acknowledgement, with a reference number and the name of the person handling it | 3 Business Days |
| Confirmation of the category, the scope and any information needed from you | 5 Business Days |
| Substantive response: the decision, the reasoning, what Pensieve will do, and by when | 30 days |
| Extended response where the grievance is complex, requires third-party input, or spans several systems | 60 days, with the reason and the revised date given inside the first 30 |
| Absolute outer limit | 90 days, the statutory maximum in Rule 14(3) of the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 |
| Where Rule 5(9) of the SPDI Rules, 2011 applies to the matter | 1 month: Pensieve applies the shorter period where both could apply |
| Progress update, without you having to ask | Every 15 days until closure |
| Implementation of a remedy Pensieve has agreed to | 30 days from the decision, or the date stated in the decision |
| Response to an appeal under 4.3 | 15 Business Days |
3.1 A security or safety grievance jumps the queue. A grievance alleging an unauthorised disclosure of
personal data, an active security compromise, or a risk to patient safety is escalated immediately to
the incident process in DIS-GL-016, and the timelines above become an outer limit rather than a target.
3.2 If Pensieve will miss a date. Pensieve tells you before it passes, with the reason and a revised date. Pensieve does not go quiet.
3.3 Which period applies in your market, and where you can read it. The periods above are
Edsol Edtech Pvt. Ltd.'s own published periods. They apply to every grievance, and RBK-GL-034 Lane A
operates them for a rights request Pensieve answers as a Data Fiduciary in its own right. Where the law of
your market fixes a different period for a rights request, that period governs, and the privacy notice for
your market states it rather than this Policy: POL-GL-053 clause 6.4, with its Annexure C for the United
Arab Emirates; POL-EU-053 for the European Economic Area; and POL-AU-053, which replaces Annexure B of
POL-GL-053 for anyone in Australia. The 90-day outer limit above is the Indian statutory maximum in
Rule 14(3) of the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025, and is not asserted as a limit in any other
market. RBK-GL-034 Section 10 maps the same periods for Pensieve's own operators; it is an internal
runbook and is not supplied to a hospital, so this clause, 6 and the notices named here are the
readable authority for a period. CHK-GL-040 records the same position for the hospital-side sheet.
4.1 The process.
| Step | What happens | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Record | Logged in the grievance register with a reference number, the date and time of receipt, the complainant, the category and the applicable clock | Grievance Officer |
| 2. Acknowledge | Reference number, named handler, expected date, and the escalation route (sent to you) | Grievance Officer |
| 3. Categorise | Data protection, security, contractual, billing, conduct, access, other. A grievance may sit in more than one | Grievance Officer |
| 4. Investigate | Records, logs, correspondence and interviews as needed. The person whose act is complained about does not investigate it | Grievance Officer, with the relevant function |
| 5. Decide | Upheld, partly upheld, or not upheld, with reasons | Grievance Officer; escalated where 4.2 applies |
| 6. Remedy | Correction, erasure, restoration of access, a process change, an apology, a service credit under POL-GL-063, or a commercial remedy |
The accountable function |
| 7. Respond | In writing, stating the decision, the reasoning, the remedy, the implementation date, and the escalation route at 6, and repeating the contact details required by Rule 9 | Grievance Officer |
| 8. Close and learn | Closure recorded; where the grievance revealed a systemic cause, a corrective action is raised and tracked | Grievance Officer |
4.2 When it is escalated inside Pensieve. A grievance is decided above the Grievance Officer where it alleges: a personal data breach; conduct of the Grievance Officer; a matter with a potential liability above the threshold in the internal delegation of authority; or a systemic failure. It then goes to the Director, who records the decision.
4.3 Appeal. If you are not satisfied with the outcome, say so within 30 days and the decision is reviewed by a person who was not involved in it. You may also go straight to the external routes at 6; an internal appeal is not a precondition, and Pensieve will not argue that it was.
4.4 What Pensieve tells you when it does not uphold a grievance. The finding, the reasoning, the evidence relied on to the extent it can be shared, and the escalation route. Pensieve will not close a grievance without an explanation.
5.1 The position. For personal data inside a hospital's tenant, the hospital is the Data Fiduciary and Pensieve is a Data Processor. A patient's rights run against the hospital. Pensieve cannot lawfully decide, on its own initiative, to disclose, correct or erase a record held on the hospital's instructions.
5.2 What Pensieve does. Where a Data Principal contacts Pensieve about a record inside a hospital's tenant, Pensieve:
5.2.1 acknowledges within 3 Business Days and explains the position in plain language;
5.2.2 tells the individual which hospital holds the record and how to reach it, where Pensieve can identify that without disclosing personal data;
5.2.3 asks the individual whether Pensieve should pass the request on, and where the individual asks
it to, forwards the request to the hospital within 2 Business Days of that answer, so the hospital's own
90-day clock is not lost. Where the individual does not ask, Pensieve forwards nothing and names no one,
because telling a hospital that a named individual approached Pensieve about their record is itself a
disclosure that Pensieve does not make on the individual's behalf unasked. Silence is treated as a refusal.
This is the rule DPA-GL-001 clause 9.1 fixes, that POL-GL-053 clause 6.9 states to the Data
Principal, that NTC-GL-019 Part B serves, and that RBK-GL-034 Section 5 operates at its step B2. This
Policy states no longer period and forwards nothing unasked;
5.2.4 provides the hospital with whatever assistance DPA-GL-001 clause 9 requires so it can answer
inside its own statutory window. CHK-GL-040 is the hospital-side sheet that assistance feeds, and it
records what the hospital decides and what Pensieve supplied; and
5.2.5 takes no decision on the merits.
5.3 The exception. Where the grievance alleges that Pensieve itself acted outside the hospital's instructions, an unauthorised access by Pensieve personnel, a processing Pensieve carried out for its own purposes, or a failure of Pensieve's own security, that is Pensieve's grievance to answer, and this Policy applies in full. Pensieve informs the hospital and answers the individual.
5.4 Pensieve's contact is not the rights route for a hospital's patients. This Policy is published and a
patient can read it, so Pensieve does not claim its contact is withheld from them. What this Policy tells a
patient is that the hospital is the organisation responsible to them, that the hospital's own notice states
how to exercise their rights, and that a contact made here is routed under 5.2 and not decided.
Presenting Pensieve as the rights route would misdirect a patient away from the party that holds the
obligation. See DPA-GL-001 clause 18.3 and POL-GL-053 clause 6.9.
5.5 The misroute rule, stated once for the whole estate. A grievance that arrives through a support channel, and a support matter that arrives through a grievance channel, are treated the same way:
5.5.1 the matter is re-routed within one Business Day of arrival, and the sender is told where it went;
5.5.2 where the matter concerns a record or a user inside a hospital's tenant, the hospital is told within three Business Days; and where the matter is a Data Principal exercising a right over data Pensieve processes for that hospital, 5.2.3 applies instead, so the hospital is told only where the individual asks Pensieve to pass the request on, and then within two Business Days of that answer; and
5.5.3 the original arrival time is recorded, and every clock, statutory or contractual, runs from that arrival and not from the re-routing.
POL-GL-056 clause 2.1 and its test T-5 state the same rule, on the three Business Day limb they address.
There is one misroute clock and this is it. The two Business Day limb is not a second misroute clock: it
is the conditional referral period DPA-GL-001 clause 9.1 fixes for a Data Principal request, stated here
in the same terms, and it runs from the individual's answer rather than from arrival. Whether a referral
happens at all is a question of the individual's consent and not of a period, so the shorter-period
operating rule at RBK-GL-034 Section 2.4 does not reach it.
The duty on every Pensieve person to route a grievance to the Grievance Officer the same Business Day,
in 2.1 and 10.1, is an internal obligation, is shorter, and is unaffected.
6.1 You may escalate at any time. Pensieve does not require you to exhaust its process first.
| Where you are | Escalate to |
|---|---|
| India | The Data Protection Board of India, once operational, by the means the Board publishes. For a matter under the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Adjudicating Officer under section 46 of that Act |
| European Union / European Economic Area, including Denmark and Norway | The supervisory authority of your habitual residence, place of work or the place of the alleged infringement; in Denmark and Norway, Datatilsynet |
| United Kingdom | The Information Commissioner's Office |
| Australia | The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner |
| United Arab Emirates | The UAE Data Office, or the applicable free-zone data protection authority |
| Any market | A court of competent jurisdiction, or the dispute mechanism in MSA-IN-001 clause 25 where you are a customer |
6.2 Pensieve will not obstruct an escalation. Pensieve does not require a complainant to sign a release, a non-disparagement undertaking or a confidentiality agreement as a condition of a remedy, and does not condition a remedy on withdrawing a regulatory complaint.
6.3 Cooperation with a regulator. Pensieve responds to a regulator's enquiry within the period the regulator sets, provides the grievance record, and tells the complainant that it has done so where it may.
7.1 The register. Every grievance is recorded with: reference, receipt date and time, complainant category, subject category, the clock applied, each communication, the decision, the reasoning, the remedy, the implementation date, the closure date, and the corrective action where any.
7.2 Retention. Grievance records are kept for 3 years from closure. See POL-GL-053 clause 7.2.
7.3 Evidence to a customer. A hospital may request the grievance record for grievances relating to its own tenant or its own users, at any time, at no charge.
7.4 Aggregate reporting. Pensieve publishes, in the Transparency Report that POL-GL-068 prescribes and
that is issued as REP-GL-033, the number of grievances received, the categories, the number upheld, and
the median and 90th-percentile time to resolution. A trust centre that publishes a grievance count of zero and no denominator is not
transparent; Pensieve publishes both.
7.5 Systemic learning. Where three or more grievances in twelve months share a root cause, a corrective action is raised, tracked to closure, and reported in the same aggregate report.
7.6 Rights-request reporting. Pensieve publishes, in the same aggregate report and under the same
denominator rule as 7.4, the measures counted at RBK-GL-034 Section 12.4 for a Data Principal
rights request: requests received, by lane and by market; the number referred to a hospital under
5.2.3, being those the individual asked Pensieve to pass on, with the median referral time; the
number upheld, partly upheld and refused; and the
median and 90th-percentile time to a substantive response. It also publishes the number of divergences
raised under the shorter-period rule at RBK-GL-034 Section 2.4, because an estate that operates the
shorter of two of its own published periods and does not say how often it had to do so is not transparent.
RBK-GL-034 Section 12.4 is the source of the counts and this clause is the published commitment to
publish them. POL-GL-068 carries them as measure M-23, and the edition in which they are published is
REP-GL-033.
8.1 Pensieve will not retaliate against anyone for raising a grievance in good faith. No credential is withdrawn, no service is degraded, no contract is terminated, no renewal is refused and no reference is withheld because a grievance was raised.
8.2 This protection extends to a hospital's employee raising a grievance about their own employer's use of the Platform. Pensieve will handle such a grievance carefully, will tell the individual what it can and cannot do, and will not disclose the individual's identity to the employer without the individual's consent unless the law requires it.
8.3 A knowingly false grievance made to cause harm is outside 8.1.
9.1 The grievance channels are usable without a Pensieve account.
9.2 The web form meets the accessibility target in POL-GL-061. Email, post and telephone are
alternatives for anyone who cannot use it.
9.3 Where you need a response in a particular format, large print, a screen-reader-friendly document, a telephone call rather than a letter, say so and Pensieve will provide it.
9.4 Where you are assisted by a relative, an advocate or a guardian, Pensieve will deal with them on your written authority.
10.1 Roles.
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Grievance Officer | Owns this Policy in operation. Receives, records, investigates, decides and answers. Escalates under 4.2. Maintains the register. |
| Director | Decides escalated grievances. Reviews the register quarterly. |
| Every Pensieve person | Routes a grievance received on any channel to the Grievance Officer the same Business Day. Failing to do so is a disciplinary matter. |
| Security | Takes a security or safety grievance into the incident process under 3.1. |
10.2 Change of Grievance Officer. Where the individual changes, the token
[TO BE SUPPLIED] is updated in the central registry, which propagates to every published
document and every draft instantly, and the previous address continues to be monitored and forwarded for
twelve (12) months. A stale grievance contact is a statutory failure, not an administrative one.
10.3 Review. This Policy is reviewed annually, on any change to the applicable law, and after any
grievance that reveals a defect in it. The review date is 31 January 2027.
| Subject | Document that owns it |
|---|---|
| What personal data Pensieve holds and your rights over it | POL-GL-053 |
| Processing of hospital tenant data, and assistance with rights | DPA-GL-001 |
| Support tickets, severities and escalation | SLA-GL-001, POL-GL-056 |
| Security incidents and breach notification | DIS-GL-016 |
| Reporting a vulnerability | POL-GL-059 |
| Demands from public authorities | POL-GL-067 |
| Aggregate reporting, and the edition in which the figures are published | POL-GL-068, REP-GL-033 |
| Operating a Data Principal rights request, and the internal clock map by market | RBK-GL-034, an internal runbook that is not supplied to a hospital |
| The rights-request period that applies in your market | POL-GL-053 clause 6.4, POL-EU-053, POL-AU-053. See 3.3 |
| The hospital's decomposition sheet for a rights request | CHK-GL-040 |
| The notice served when a Data Principal asks for their request to be forwarded | NTC-GL-019 |
| Service credits | POL-GL-063 |
| Accessibility | POL-GL-061 |
| Version | Date | Author | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5.0 | 2026-08-29 | Legal | Makes the published grievance channel resolve, and describes it as what it is. Clause 2.1 offered https://trust.pensievelabs.org/grievance as a Web form. No such route was served, so a statutory channel published under section 8(9) of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, in a document at the Public tier, returned a 404 to the Data Principal who most needed it. The Trust Center now serves that page: it carries this statutory notice, the clocks at 3, the routing rule at 5 and the escalation routes at 6, and it opens a message to the Grievance Officer with the fields at 2.3 already in it. The row is restated to say so, because the page is not a form: there is no grievance intake table, none is invented, and describing an e-mail channel as a web form would misdescribe where the record of a grievance lives. That is the position 2.5 already states. No channel is withdrawn, no period changes, and no commitment in this Policy is widened or narrowed. |
| 1.4.0 | 2026-08-29 | Legal | Conforms clause 5 to the conditional forwarding rule the estate now operates, and clears three status claims that had been overtaken. Clause 5.2.3 stated that Pensieve notifies the hospital within 2 Business Days that a Data Principal has approached it, and attributed that unconditional notification to DPA-GL-001 clause 9.1 and NTC-GL-019. Both instruments have since been corrected: DPA-GL-001 clause 9.1 at version 1.1.0 and NTC-GL-019 at version 1.1.0 now forward only where the Data Principal asks, within 2 Business Days of that answer, and forward nothing and name no one where they do not, because telling a hospital that a named individual approached Pensieve about their record is itself a disclosure. POL-GL-053 clause 6.9 states the same to the Data Principal, and RBK-GL-034 Section 2.4 raised the point as defect D-3 against DPA-GL-001 clause 9.1 and NTC-GL-019 alone; this Policy stated the same unconditional form and no defect row named it. This Policy is T_PUBLIC, so it published a commitment to make that disclosure unasked, to the very individuals it would be made about. Clause 5.2.3 is rewritten to the conditional form, clause 5.5.2 follows it, and the closing paragraph of clause 5.5 no longer describes the two Business Day limb as an application of the shorter-period rule, which RBK-GL-034 Section 2.4 expressly states does not reach a question of consent. Clause 7.6 records that the referral count is of referrals the individual asked for. The change-history entry for version 1.2.0 no longer says the FRM-GL-505 step 4 correction is still required: it landed at that form's version 1.0.1. Clauses 7.4 and 7.6 name REP-GL-033 as the edition in which the figures are published, which POL-GL-068 clause 1.2.1 fixes, and clause 7.6 names measure M-23 as the row that now carries the rights-request breakdown and the divergence count. Clause 5.4 is conformed to the correction POL-GL-053 made at its version 1.1.0 to the closing sentence of its clause 6.9: a published policy cannot say that Pensieve's contact is not published to patients, so clause 5.4 now says what is true, that Pensieve's contact is not the rights route and a contact made here is routed rather than decided. The authoring note records that all four additional Grievance Officer tokens are defined in the central token registry. No period, no channel and no commitment in this Policy is widened or narrowed. |
| 1.3.0 | 2026-08-29 | Legal | Adds clause 3.3, which states which period applies in which market and where a reader who cannot open an internal document may read it. CHK-GL-040 and RBK-GL-034 Section 10 both cite clause 3 as the readable authority for Pensieve Labs's own periods, and RBK-GL-034 is T_INTERNAL and is not supplied to a hospital, so clause 3 has to be safe to rely on in every market. It was not: the table states 30 days, 60 days and a 90-day outer limit without saying that the 90-day limit is the Indian maximum in Rule 14(3) and that a rights request in another market runs on that market's own period, which is what RBK-GL-034 clause 4.3 already operates for the two further months the General Data Protection Regulation allows. Clause 3.3 states the boundary, names POL-GL-053 clause 6.4 with its Annexure C, POL-EU-053 and POL-AU-053 as the notices that state the market period, and creates no new period. The Related documents table is amended to the same effect and records that RBK-GL-034 is internal. |
| 1.2.0 | 2026-08-29 | Legal | Corrects the referral clock at clause 5.2.3 from 3 Business Days to 2 Business Days, so that this Policy states the period DPA-GL-001 clause 9.1 fixes, NTC-GL-019 serves and RBK-GL-034 operates, rather than a longer period Pensieve does not run. RBK-GL-034 Section 2.4 carried the divergence as open defect D-1 against this Policy and against FRM-GL-505 step 4, and it is published without a gate, so the correction is made here; the matching correction to FRM-GL-505 step 4 landed at that form's version 1.0.1. Splits clause 5.5.2 so that the general three Business Day misroute notification, which POL-GL-056 clause 2.1 and test T-5 state identically, is preserved, while a Data Principal rights request runs on the shorter clause 5.2.3 period; states in clause 5.5 that the shorter limb is the DPA-GL-001 clause 9.1 referral period and not a second misroute clock. Names CHK-GL-040 at clause 5.2.4 as the hospital-side sheet the DPA-GL-001 clause 9 assistance feeds. Adds clause 7.6, publishing the rights-request measures counted at RBK-GL-034 Section 12.4, including the count of divergences raised under the shorter-period rule, which no existing measure captured. |
| 1.1.0 | 2026-08-20 | Legal | Adds clause 5.5, which states the misroute rule once for the whole estate: re-routed within one Business Day, the hospital told within three Business Days, and every clock running from the original arrival rather than from the re-routing. Reconciles this Policy with POL-GL-056 clause 2.1 and test T-5, which previously stated a different clock. |
| 1.0.0 | 2026-07-31 | Legal | First published version. Statutory Grievance Officer notice meeting DPDP section 8(9), Rule 9 and Rule 14(3) and SPDI Rule 5(9); named acknowledgement, response and outer-limit timelines; the routing rule for grievances about a hospital's own processing; external escalation without an exhaustion requirement; non-retaliation; and aggregate publication of grievance volumes with a denominator. |
POL-GL-066 v1.5.0 | Last Modified On 29 August 2026 | Review due
31 January 2027 | Published at https://trust.pensievelabs.org