Search all 478 artefacts by title, document ID or content.
Policy | Family 12, People, Labour & Internal Governance
Edsol Edtech Pvt. Ltd. operates a vigil mechanism. It is not required to by the Companies Act, 2013; section 177(9) applies to listed companies and to certain classes of company that Edsol Edtech Pvt. Ltd. does not fall within. It exists because the Company writes software that hospitals run their operations, and the…
This document is the source of truth for: marketing:/legal/whistleblower, marketing:/legal/speak-up
Those surfaces render this text from here. They do not keep their own copy, so they cannot drift from it.
Artefacts this one references or cannot be issued without.
Artefacts that would be blocked if this one were missing or out of date.
Edsol Edtech Pvt. Ltd. operates a vigil mechanism. It is not required to by the Companies Act, 2013;
section 177(9) applies to listed companies and to certain classes of company that Edsol Edtech Pvt. Ltd.
does not fall within. It exists because the Company writes software that hospitals run their operations
on, and the cheapest possible way to learn that something is wrong is from the person who noticed it.
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Patient and clinical risk | Anything in Pensieve that could cause a patient to be treated as the wrong patient, a result to be attached to the wrong record, or a clinician to act on wrong information |
| Security and data | A control that has been bypassed, a credential in the wrong place, an access nobody revoked, a suspected breach, a shortcut taken under deadline pressure |
| Misrepresentation | A claim made to a hospital about a certification, a customer, a capability or a metric that is not true (POL-IN-305 Section 1.3) |
| Bribery and corruption | A payment, a gift, a facilitation payment, a referral fee, a demand from an official (STM-GL-030) |
| Financial impropriety | Falsified records, misuse of funds, an invoice for work not done |
| Conduct | Discrimination, harassment, bullying, retaliation. Sexual harassment goes to the IC under POL-IN-306, which is a statutory process and takes precedence |
| Legal and regulatory | Any contravention of law, or of a contractual commitment to a hospital |
| Your own mistake | Expressly in scope. See Section 5 |
| Channel | Address | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Direct to the Founder | [TO BE SUPPLIED] |
The default route |
| Grievance Officer | info@pensievelabs.org |
Where the report concerns the Founder, or where the person prefers not to go to the Founder |
| External Member of the IC | Posh external member email |
Where the report concerns conduct and the person wants a route outside the Company entirely |
| Anonymous | Whistleblower anonymous channel |
Accepted. An anonymous report is investigated on its merits; the only limitation is that the Company cannot come back to ask a question, so detail matters |
| Security-specific | info@pensievelabs.org |
For a vulnerability or an incident. External reporters use POL-GL-059 |
3.1 No form is required. A sentence is enough. There is no obligation to have evidence, to be certain, or to have exhausted anything first.
| Step | Timing | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Acknowledgement, with a reference number and the name of the person handling it | 3 Business Days | Recipient |
| Assessment: investigate, refer to another process (IC, security incident, grievance), or close with reasons | 10 Business Days | Founder, or Grievance Officer where conflicted |
| Immediate action where there is a risk to a patient, to data, or to a hospital's operation | Same day. The investigation continues in parallel; it does not gate the containment | Founder |
| Investigation | 30 days, extendable once to 60 days with the reason given to the reporter inside the first 30 | Investigator |
| Outcome communicated to the reporter: what was found and what is being done | 5 Business Days of conclusion | Investigator |
| Progress update, without being asked | Every 15 days | Investigator |
| Appeal, to a person not involved in the original decision | 15 Business Days | Founder or External Member |
4.1 The person complained about does not investigate the complaint, and does not choose the investigator.
4.2 Where a report reveals something a hospital needs to know, the hospital is told: under
NTC-GL-002 where it is a security or data matter, and by the Founder directly otherwise. POL-IN-305
Section 2.5. The existence of an internal investigation is not a reason to delay a notification to a customer,
and never a reason to miss the four-hour commitment in DIS-GL-016.
5.1 No retaliation. No person suffers any detriment for making a report in good faith: no change to
duties, appraisal, remuneration, project allocation or standing. Retaliation is gross misconduct under
POL-GL-322 and is treated as more serious than the matter originally reported.
5.2 Good faith, not correctness. A report that turns out to be mistaken is protected. A report is unprotected only where it was knowingly false, and that requires a finding on inquiry with reasons recorded.
5.3 Reporting your own error is protected and is treated more leniently than the same error discovered by somebody else. This is stated because it changes behaviour: a person who has just made a production mistake at two in the morning decides in the next sixty seconds whether to tell anybody, and the whole cost of the incident turns on that decision.
5.4 Confidentiality. The reporter's identity is known to the smallest number of people necessary and is not disclosed to the person reported about unless the reporter agrees or the law requires it. Where identity must be disclosed, the reporter is told first.
5.5 No contractual gag. No employment contract, settlement, separation agreement or non-disclosure
agreement made by Edsol Edtech Pvt. Ltd. prevents a person from reporting under this Policy, from
reporting to a statutory authority, or from giving evidence. Any such term is void to that extent:
POL-IN-302 clause 6.3.
5.6 Access to a regulator is not conditional on internal reporting. A person may go straight to CERT-In,
the Data Protection Board, a labour authority or the police, at any time, without telling
Edsol Edtech Pvt. Ltd. first.
Every report, its assessment, its investigation, its outcome and the date of each step are recorded in a
register held by the Founder with restricted access, retained for Hr whistleblower retention years
years. Aggregate numbers (reports received, upheld, pending) are published annually. No identifying
detail is published, and no case is discussed with a customer or a prospect.
A grievance about pay, hours, leave, workload, a manager, a decision or a working condition, anything that
is not in Section 2, is raised with the person's manager first, then with the Founder, then in writing to
info@pensievelabs.org. The timelines in Section 4 apply. A grievance from a person with a
disability, or about accessibility, may be raised with the Liaison Officer named in POL-IN-307 Section 2, who is
the grievance redressal officer for matters under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
Grievances from outside the Company (from a hospital, a Data Principal or a member of the public) are
handled under POL-GL-066, which carries the statutory clocks. This Policy is internal.
| Topic | Document |
|---|---|
| Code of Conduct | POL-IN-305 |
| POSH: the statutory route for sexual harassment | POL-IN-306 |
| Disciplinary procedure | POL-GL-322 |
| External grievances and the statutory clocks | POL-GL-066 |
| External vulnerability reports | POL-GL-059 |
| Incident notification to hospitals | DIS-GL-016, NTC-GL-002 |
| Anti-bribery declaration | STM-GL-030 |
| Version | Date | Author | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 31 July 2026 |
Founder | First publication. Equal Opportunity Policy addressing each matter section 21 of the RPwD Act requires, with the Liaison Officer named and the below-threshold position stated candidly; transgender and HIV-status protections with designated officers; whistleblower policy stating openly that no vigil mechanism is legally required and why one exists anyway; own-error reporting expressly protected and treated more leniently; no contractual gag; regulator access unconditional. |